Hello ladies and gents! Well, thanks to the wonderful and talented Monster Scholar aka. Jeanette over at Monster Land, I now have this beautiful, custom made banner for my blog. I sure do appreciate it, as well as her fabulous blog (not to mention the contents of her brain, which I have been picking for the last couple of weeks). Ms. Jeanette has even suggested we do a collaborative article together that would bring together the intimately related genres of horror and XXX - watch this space!
Posted on Wednesday, September 9, 2009 at 4:12 PM
Hey y'all. So, a little while ago I mentioned that a) blogs about porn that actually analyze or treat the films with a modicum of respect are rare, b) the ones that exist are well appreciated by me, and c) I said that I would dig around and find some of these rarities and report back. Well, here I am with my findings. Enjoy!
P.S. I sincerely hope that my list is missing some important mentions, and is far from complete. Please help extend the list by letting me know of any other interesting porn-related blogs that you know of.
1. XXX Marks the Plot: A lot of you already read Mr. X-Ray's informative and timely reviews of porn movies with plot (yes, they have plots...sometimes really interesting and challenging ones. Shock!). X-Ray's reviews are a much-needed contribution to the porn-blog world simply because they are simple, to the point, and feel like a "normal" movie review. It's very refreshing to be able to chat with someone about these movies and reaffirm our normality...
2. Ms. Naughty Porn For Women: I almost jumped for joy when I found this site. A website and blog that exclusively caters to women, and that doesn't mean the kind of porn you might expect from the stereotypes that abound regarding women, feminism, and pornography. Ms. Naughty addresses all manner of films and sexualities (because, y'know, we're diverse...) and I have her to thank for a number of interesting and important news items regarding the world of porn and its female filmmakers. Thank you Ms. Naughty!
3. Movies About Girls: Not exclusively about porn, but, given the topic for this blog/podcast, porn comes up fairly regularly. The thing I enjoy about this blog/podcast, aside from how funny and intelligent it is, is that I am forced to consider the differences in films and genres that all deal in representations of sex and sexuality (turns out hardcore isn't the only kind...). I love the podcast especially, but either way, Movies About Girls is a big favourite of mine: highly entertaining and highly educational.
4. Cinema Babylon: Mr. Rubin writes about pornography/x-rated film and genre in an intelligent and scholarly fashion - a much needed contribution to the world of porn blogs. Please keep it up!
5. The Art and Business of Making Erotic Films/ The Intent to Arouse: Both of these blogs are managed by one of the people behind Comstock Films, a company that produces technically hardcore films, but films that complicate our notions of pornography. These complications, and concepts of genre, are the focus of many of the blog posts here, as well as other interesting thoughts about the industry, and are consistently thought-provoking. Tony raises important, and difficult, questions about sex, sex industries, and film genres.
6. Bijou Studios Blog: The guys over at Bijou Video post regularly with news items, historical information, and cultural commentary about the gay adult industry, and its films and stars. The blog posts are always pertinent and interesting, and their dvd catalogue is frankly awesome. I look forward to being able to afford the Kansas City Trucking Co. poster - next paycheck, Jack Wrangler here I come.
7. Sock Hop Gang Bang: Great title, great blog, but I fear they are AWOL. It's been a while since these two posted, but I hold out hope that they will return with their informative and entertaining film reviews.
8. Pornonomy: Ok Mr. Feelbert - I'm listing you in good faith that you will continue your masterful movie reviews, and that your last two weren't simply to pacify me and your fellow porn nerds. Please continue your interesting and entertaining porn posts - we need you!
Ok, that's all I got right now. I purposefully left out the big name websites that seem to do a lot of advertising, and tried to focus more on the little people. Please tell me I have completely overlooked multiple fascinating and well-written blogs about the pornographic medium - let us all know!
Even when I find Shaun Costello's films hard to watch, I always find something interesting about them, and as a result can call him one of my favorite directors. Costello made Water Power in 1977, reportedly in less than 24 hours (don't be confused by the poster's invokation of Gerard Damiano's name - according to the Grindhouse Cinema Database, the film was funded by the mob, and they used Damiano's name because they thought it would market the film more successfully), which I find really shocking considering how impressive this film is. It certainly feels gritty, low budget, and has that guerrilla feel to it, but it's also artistic, meaningful, and oddly amusing. Costello himself said he thought this was his funniest film. Well, before you go buying this thinking it's a laugh riot, please take the following into consideration, and don't say I didn't warn you.
For those of you who don't know, Water Power depicts the crimes of "The Enema Bandit," played brilliantly by Jamie Gillis, a fairly reclusive man who, at the beginning of the film, seems to be sexually frustrated and seeking a fitting outlet for his perversions. He looks at porn, peeps at his neighbors, and generally seems outraged and disgusted by sexually active women, whom he regards as dirty. He takes a trip to the local brothel, the Garden of Eden (run by the wonderful Gloria Leonard), which caters to all tastes and offers "specials" including "colonics." Gillis is allowed to observe one of these specials, and seems to have a life-altering experience. He returns home, and immediately becomes obsessed with enemas as a way of cleaning out filthy women. A crazy rampage ensues, as Gillis goes around raping and giving enemas to women he deems to be dirty, and "The Enema Bandit" becomes a top priority for the police department. The cop in charge is assigned a female partner, and they try to track down Gillis using the female cop as a decoy.
First I should note that there seem to be several different versions of this film floating around, some of which are cut. I watched the uncut version, and was frankly shocked by the extent of the enemas - I'm talking lots of shit and "brown water." It was all pretty disgusting. Then of course there is the rapes, which while not as disturbing as in Forced Entry, are still unpalatable, and certainly didn't seem intended to arouse. There are a couple of consensual sex scenes, but for the most part the film consists of rape.
With that out of the way, I found this film compelling in a lot of ways - Gillis is outstanding, and really contributes a lot in terms of artistic merit. The majority of his lines are spoken in the form of diary entries, which he writes consistently throughout the film. Some of these entries are darkly humorous, particularly when he starts talking about the importance of his "life's work," and the necessity to learn his craft and acquire all necessary materials in order to do the job properly. As he puts it, "I can't just shove tubes up their asses and hope for the best." There is a brief montage that accompanies this particular entry, which adds to the absurdity of it all.
In terms of how they present the narrative, it seems as though, as with Forced Entry, Costello is trying to do something entirely removed from the assumed pornographic goal. Most people assume that porn is, and has always been, solely about arousal of the spectator, but even a cursory overview of some significant films since 1970 would demonstrate that porn has always operated in much more complex ways. I would argue that nowadays porn seems to cater to this common assumption (there are some exceptions, such as Cry Wolf), but during the "Golden Age" in particular, filmmakers seemed to be experimenting in much more radical ways. I can understand why someone might read some of these narratives on paper and be horrified that someone out there is "getting off" to this kind of thing, but watching the films themselves is an entirely different experience from simply "getting off" to something.
Furthermore, in many of these films there seems to be an effort to say something about the sexual inequality between the genders, as well as cultural ideas about female sexuality. It's pretty clear from the outset of Water Power that the film is addressing the way Western culture feels about female sexuality, and how it teaches us individually to feel about female sexuality. Even though the Enema Bandit is the ostensible protagonist, his first victim (the girl he has been peeping on through his telescope) is shown to be entirely innocent. She has a consensual sexual relationship with a male partner, and it is this that disgusts Gillis to the point of "purifying" her; he wants her to be pure, to not desire sex, and once he realises that she is enjoying herself, he is horrified. The subsequent rape and enema demonstrates the irony of the Madonna/whore ideal that patriarchal culture perpetuates - Gillis' character genuinely believes he is doing a service to society, and that his "work" is of the upmost importance.
Of course, there is no denying the exploitation of rape within the movie, but it's worth bearing in mind that all films about rape exploit the trauma of the act within the narrative. Films like The Accused (1988) are regarded as noble, yet I find The Accused more offensive than Water Power or Forced Entry due to structure, and more simply because of the way critics and society at large seem to embrace and reward films such as The Accused, while dismissing films such as Water Power simply because of genre, and the perceived intentions of the film. Water Power is deemed exploitative because it shows penetration and is labeled "pornography," while The Accused is deemed noble, in spite of the fact that it uses the comparatively graphic rape scene as some kind of finale that everything builds up to and we are invited to look forward to in some perverse way, effectively becoming more of a titillating experience than anything in Water Power (not to mention a socially sanctioned titillating experience).
With all that said, I can understand people's grave reservations about this film, and others like it, and of course it prompts one to wonder what exactly the intention was in making the film. But I tend to think that "intention" is not the only determinant of how works of art are received, and it's more than likely that many films intended to be noble works that treat difficult subject matter with sensitivity and honesty are received by many as arousing. The striking thing about critical reception to these films is how class-based these receptions are.